Gay apology?
From the PFLAG at Detroit, a quote from Paul Cameron, founder of the Family Research Institute and ISIS, the institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality, and a guy that opposes gays in a very confusing manner:
"Untrammeled homosexuality can take over and destroy a social system," says Cameron. "If you isolate sexuality as something solely for one's own personal amusement, and all you want is the most satisfying orgasm you can get- and that is what homosexuality seems to be-then homosexuality seems too powerful to resist. The evidence is that men do a better job on men and women on women, if all you are looking for is orgasm." So powerful is the allure of gays, Cameron believes, that if society approves that gay people, more and more heterosexuals will be inexorably drawn into homosexuality. "I'm convinced that lesbians are particularly good seducers," says Cameron. "People in homosexuality are incredibly evangelical," he adds, sounding evangelical himself. "It's pure sexuality. It's almost like pure heroin. It's such a rush. They are committed in almost a religious way. And they'll take enormous risks, do anything." He says that for married men and women, gay sex would be irresistible. "Martial sex tends toward the boring end," he points out. "Generally, it doesn't deliver the kind of sheer sexual pleasure that homosexual sex does" So, Cameron believes, within a few generations homosexuality would be come the dominant form of sexual behavior.
Dr. Cameron, are you in favor or against? Because that sounds like an apology instead of an attack!
In conclusion, gay sex is as heroin, and we all know that, according to Irvine Welsh in Trainspotting,heroin is like an orgasm:
Take the best orgasm you ever had, multiply it by a thousand and you're still nowhere near it.
Ergo, Homosexual sex ought to be like a galactic orgasm, the orgasm to liquefy all orgasms? Via Long Story Short Pier who got it from tBogg.
Comments
What a total crackpot and closet case! Ha
Ps. Do your brothers read this blog? Just curious what they think about it. :)
Posted by: Liz | July 14, 2004 5:47 PM
I gave them the URI, but I doubt they read it. They know my views, anyway!
About Dr. Cameron's views: it is an old practice to disqualify one's opponents by means of pseudo-science and wild exaggerations. This seems to be one of these cases.
I mean, better than a thousand orgasms? Damn! Who would be able to resist? The whole society would collapse in a big heap of wreathing, sweaty, orgasmed bodies. Can't have that, too many happy people!
Posted by: Camilo | July 15, 2004 8:22 AM