« Hero | Main | Beta »

War on Terror

We lost the war on terrorism. A simple attack on one clear morning reduced the careful yet frail system of justice and accountability that existed in this country to ashes, and suddenly there are a thousand dogs, eagerly looking over your shoulder for your latest mistake, there are a thousand thugs with guns, backed by a cynical secretary of defense and a genuflecting president, and there are a thousand eager combatants, suddenly justified in their anger against this country.

Mr. Rumsfeld's actions and responsibility go beyond the events at the Abu Ghraib camp. Surely, as Secretary of Defense, he ought to know what was going there - that is not just another place, nor are these just kids from Virginia. The prison and torture center is crucial to the intelligence gathering and thus central to whatever military strategy Rumsfeld seems to be pursuing. Them why he avoids knowledge or accountability?

The Washington Post clearly points to his blatant disregard for laws and treaties, and how in his exceedingly arrogant way he simply blazed through a very complicated situation that involves other countries in the most volatile region in the world. Rumsfeld has become synonym with torture, lack of accountability and hubris:

On Monday Mr. Rumsfeld's spokesman said that the secretary had not read Mr. Taguba's report, which was completed in early March. Yesterday Mr. Rumsfeld told a television interviewer that he still hadn't finished reading it, and he repeated his view that the Geneva Conventions "did not precisely apply" but were only "basic rules" for handling prisoners. His message remains the same: that the United States need not be bound by international law and that the crimes Mr. Taguba reported are not, for him, a priority. That attitude has undermined the American military's observance of basic human rights and damaged this country's ability to prevail in the war on terrorism.

Let's not even speak of the terrible price the USA will pay for this. It is not humiliation, but provocation and justification; the USA monster finally showing its arrogant ugly head. Rebecca Blood is completely wrong when she says

We are not a warrior culture. So how can we go to war without dehumanizing the enemy? Ah, that's the rub.
But the USA is the most militaristic culture in the world, far surpassing in spending, military interventions, military presence, budget and active personnel that of every nation in the world. Perhaps China might have a bigger military apparatus, but they are not imposing their beliefs in the weaker countries by the use of weapons (They are more subtle, I do agree). So, yes, the USA is a warrior culture, and everything different, from race to religion to ideology has been used to disqualify the other - the enemy.

Today on NPR, and interview featuring Joe Galloway (who had a piece about Rumsfeld failed strategy more than a year ago) and Joel Himmelfarb, (who likes to twist meanings and words), assistant editor for the WashTimes. I was shocked to hear Mr. Himelfarb advocating Rumsfeld's actions, saying that he took the system out of that lengthy process against terrorists, where they were tried one by one, to a situation in which they are killed outright. Himelfarb just said that Rumfeld disposed of the rule of law and due process, and went the rule of force, and he agreed with that.

Again, we lost the war on terrorism, because terror is not an attack, a place or an enemy. Terrorism is a situation in which the rule of law disappears, the rights accorded to the individuals by a nation are abrogated by those that hold opposing values, and the social contract vanishes amidst a barrage of accusations and blames, where no body is responsible and accountability exists no more.

UPDATE: A formatting mistake made the quote from Rebecca Blood appear within the text of the rest of the post. That has been fixed.

blinklist : del.icio.us : DIGG : furl : shadows : simpy : spurl : yahoo

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.confusedkid.com/mt/mt-oud56j3evbf2.cgi/2535

Comments

you misread my point. I agree that we are a militaristic culture, and a violent one. a warrior culture is different. it honors warriors, it's organized around its warriors in a way in which ours isn't, and as a result, warriors are revered and treated with a certain respect, even when they are the enemy.

we are not that culture. we do not honor warriors, we create them temporarily and then we try to dismantle them afterwards. our method of indoctrination--the way we convince our young people to shoot designated others without remorse--is to dehumanize the enemy, not to honor and respect them.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Please enter the security code you see here